A discussion draft released by U.S. lawmakers proposes a new federal framework for autonomous vehicles. While the SELF DRIVE Act of 2026 has not been introduced as legislation, it is very relevant to Canada’s collision repair ecosystem. Automated driving systems and advanced driver-assistance technologies already influence how vehicles are repaired, and changes to U.S. safety oversight and regulatory approaches can affect vehicle design, repair requirements and insurance practices in Canada due to the integrated nature of the North American automotive market.
The draft was co-authored by Republican Representative Bob Latta of Ohio and Democratic Representative Debbie Dingell of Michigan. In a press release, Latta’s office said the bipartisan measure would establish a national safety and regulatory framework for autonomous vehicle technology.
The draft would update U.S. motor vehicle safety law for vehicles equipped with automated driving systems. It would give the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration expanded authority over testing and deployment of self-driving vehicles.
Manufacturers would be required to submit safety documentation before deployment. The draft also directs regulators to create evaluation and compliance programs for automated systems and includes cybersecurity planning requirements.
The proposal would also limit states’ ability to set their own technical rules for autonomous vehicles. Supporters say that would reduce inconsistent state requirements. Critics say it could interfere with state authority in areas such as insurance and liability.
As a discussion document, the draft is not a bill. Rather, it is circulated to gather feedback from stakeholders before a bill is formally introduced, debated or voted on.
Industry associations representing autonomous vehicle developers welcomed the draft.
Jeff Farrah, chief executive officer of the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, said in a statement that the proposal “represents a turning point for American transportation policy” and would provide “clear rules, strong safety standards, and the regulatory certainty needed to scale deployment nationwide.”
A coalition letter organized by United for Autonomy also backed the proposal. The group includes technology, manufacturing and transportation associations.
“Federal leadership is essential to avoid a patchwork of state laws that could slow innovation and delay safety benefits,” the coalition said in its submission to lawmakers.
Several auto insurance industry groups expressed concern in public statements.
David Sampson, president and CEO of the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, said the organization opposes the draft “as currently written,” warning that some provisions could override state insurance laws.
The National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies also raised objections.
“States have long regulated insurance and liability, and any federal framework must respect that authority,” the association said in a statement responding to the draft.
