Continue to Site »
Site will load in 15 seconds
Advertisment: Autel » Autel - Order 6246 » Autel Leaderboard July 2025 » Autel Leaderboard July 2025

Controlling Codes: U.S. aftermarket pleased with Supreme Court ruling on Google API code case

supremecourt

Washington D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday, in the case of Google v. Oracle, comes with an enthusiastic response from the American auto industry now that OE-compatible software has officially been approved for the aftermarket.

“The Auto Care Association is pleased with the April 5 decision by the Supreme Court, which stated that application program interfaces are fair use for building compatible components,” said Aaron Lowe, senior vice president, regulatory and government affairs for the Auto Care Association.

The case, Google v. Oracle as originally decided by a Federal Circuit Court, had found in favor of Oracle that Google had violated a software copyright when it copied a small part of the application program interfaces (API) code.

API codes are a necessary component in developing programs on Google’s Android platform.

The Auto Care Association, along with Static Control, filed an amicus brief on Jan. 13, 2020, regarding the potential that if the lower court decision had been permitted to stand, it would severely limit the ability of aftermarket companies to produce compatible replacement parts for software-driven vehicles. 

“While this Court consistently has interpreted intellectual property rights so as not to interfere with the public’s right to repair the chattels they own, the Federal Circuit opinion would allow OEMs to leverage copyright to bar independent competition for replacement parts and repair services,” the brief states.

The Auto Care Association’s brief urged the Supreme Court not to permit copyright protection “to API-declaring code that specifies the data and functions necessary to interoperability.” 

“It is clear from the decision that the Court understood the implications of permitting companies to copyright APIs in order to prevent lawful development of compatible replacement parts and to perform vehicle repairs,” said Lowe. 

“We appreciate the Court’s understanding of the impact on competition of software copyright issues.”

Advertisment: Global Finishing Solutions » GLOBAL FINISHING SOLUTIONS- Order 6240 » GFS Featured Rect July 2025 » GFS Featured Rect July 2025
Page 1 of 1657
Next Page
Advertisment: Simplicity Car Care » Simplicity - Order 6222 » Simplicity Featured Rect July 2025 » Simplicity Featured Rect July 2025
Advertisment: Car-O-Liner Automotive Systems » CAR-O-LINER - Order 6158 » COL Leaderboard July 2025 » COL Leaderboard July 2025